In silico veritas.

The right to (be) content

Posted: January 10th, 2011 | Author: | Filed under: Tech | Tags: , , , , | 8 Comments »

A new post up at Ars Technica talks (almost) universally-compatible DRM:

At CES today, the Digital Entertainment Content Ecosystem announced more details of its “buy once, play anywhere” cloud-based authentication system for digital video content. The scheme, which was dubbed “UltraViolet” last year, will allow users to purchase video content from any participating retailer and then authenticate that content on any UltraViolet-compatible device.

UltraViolet will support six accounts per family, each of which can access the full set of family-owned video content, and it will support 12 unique devices per family. That might sound like plenty, but DECE envisions UltraViolet content being displayed on Internet-connected TVs, game consoles, smartphones, computers, Internet-connected Blu-ray players, tablets, and set-top boxes.

While this seems like a fine development on the face of things, I have to echo some of the concerns raised about it both in the article and in the comments section. First, the Ars take:

All of this could have been accomplished years ago by just selling the video without DRM, like the music industry finally did, since anyone interested in pirating the content had no difficulty in doing so anyway. But DECE and UltraViolet look like a decent second option, and people have shown their willingness to put up with DRM when it doesn’t get in their way (Kindle, iPhone apps, iTunes video, Xbox games). […]

Still, we’re quite curious to see how this works out in practice, especially without Apple’s support. The paranoia that Hollywood has shown for so many years around tight DRM, broadcast flags, and more makes us suspect that UltraViolet will be locked down tightly enough to be annoying, despite DECE’s many protests about openness. But we’re willing to be surprised by sanity.

I, for one, am not holding my breath, for precisely the reasons mentioned here. Paraphrasing one of the commenters on the article, do we really want the people who took over a decade to figure out a remotely equitable rights-management and authentication scheme to be the same ones governing said scheme across multiple platforms and media production outlets?

Nor is this scheme even a global panacea. Of particular note was this commenter’s critique of the still extant “regional” distribution model:

The distribution (and rating) model is hopelessly inadequate.

If I live outside the US, I am at the mercy of distribution agreements and focus group testing as to 1) when an episode will be played here, or 2) whether it even comes over at all.

Great. So I want to see the latest episode of Chuck, but my Cable TV provider is only showing season 2. Or I want to watch Leno, which isn’t even shown in this country.

I can’t pay for an online subscription to a network or a series of shows. There isn’t an ad-supported way to access these shows from outside the US. What option do I have other than to pirate?

I was doing my best, for the sake of argument, to think of some method by which this commenter could acquire the content he or she sought without having to resort to piracy. In this age of obstinate traditional media conglomerates trying (and failing) to stare the Internet down into submission, I unsurprisingly couldn’t think of a single one.

The law-abiding/pro-copyright citizen might simply argue that that person would simply have to go without that particular content until such time as it was made legally available from a licensed source. Naturally, to anyone who loves his or her music, movies, or TV shows, this seems a profoundly unsatisfying response — particularly today, as we near the Age of Etewaf. On the other hand, the implicit assumption of those who take no issue with content piracy — that consumers have an uninfringible right to the content they desire, copyright holders and other restrictions be damned — seems equally untenable. Of course, attempts at understanding this impasse and trying to bridge it are made difficult by the fact that the reasons people pirate are almost as numerous as the people doing it.

While systems like UltraViolet are intended as a means of solving the Internet era’s dilemma between equitably compensating rights-holders and the ease with which copyright is violated, I’ll believe the entertainment-industrial complex has come up with a proper solution when I see it.

[Image: Flickr/tom-b]


2 comments